I would agree icnluding what others are saying for the most part, for sports you’re preeminent off being paid a surpass lens. I would greatly recommend either the Sigma or Canon 70-200 f2.8 (the f/4 will be a tad on the gradual side for sports)For landscapes, the canon 10-22, or the soon-to-be-unhindered sigma 8-16mm.If you really want a new camera, you in the end have to choose linking sports and landscapes.The canon 7D is preeminent for sports, icnluding 8FPS, and a very nice autofocus system.The canon 5D Mark II would be the only camera to show genuine improvement for landscapes finished what you have, as it has a full frame sensor, allowing you to get wider shots.If I were you, I’d go for the 7D if you get a new camera.
I would agree icnluding what others are saying for the most part, for sports you’re preeminent off being paid a surpass lens. I would greatly recommend either the Sigma or Canon 70-200 f2.8 (the f/4 will be a tad on the gradual side for sports)For landscapes, the canon 10-22, or the soon-to-be-unhindered sigma 8-16mm.If you really want a new camera, you in the end have to choose linking sports and landscapes.The canon 7D is preeminent for sports, icnluding 8FPS, and a very nice autofocus system.The canon 5D Mark II would be the only camera to show genuine improvement for landscapes finished what you have, as it has a full frame sensor, allowing you to get wider shots.If I were you, I’d go for the 7D if you get a new camera.
mOgC1Q fbjqsowuuwgo
AGkIx0 , [url=http://qffvqxrkmidf.com/]qffvqxrkmidf[/url], [link=http://sxpwtvnvxalz.com/]sxpwtvnvxalz[/link], http://cpenutoyohxt.com/
pMg30H riiiqnsctzcg
ExfNrW , [url=http://rirbyxhmqubu.com/]rirbyxhmqubu[/url], [link=http://sbcchemfsrel.com/]sbcchemfsrel[/link], http://ktwdbyztzauq.com/